Skip navigation Cotton Marketing Planner
Dr. John Robinson's Contact Information
  Texas Cooperative Extension Cotton Incorporated  
Recent Updates Prices Cost of Production Supply and Demand Marketing

Welcome to John Robinson's Web Site on Cotton Marketing & Risk Management

The Cotton Marketing Planner Newsletter focuses on farm-level implementation of strategies for Texas cotton growers to deal with yield and price risk. E-mail me to receive a weekly e-mail notice of when the latest edition is posted on-line.

Monday October 6, 2008

Cotton Cost Expectations

A marketing plan is a contingency plan of actions that you will take in various possible, but ultimately uncertain, market situations. Developing and implementing a marketing plan begins with an estimate of expected production costs. Without accurate farm-specific cost information, it is impossible to set meaningful pricing goals to cover your production costs. Texas cotton growers have a number of available sources of information and programs to help them figure their production costs as accurately and completely as possible.

Cotton 2008/09 Fundamental Analysis and Forecast

The cotton supply/demand picture for 2008/09 remains framed by USDA's September 12 World Agricultural Supply/Demand Estimates (WASDE) report (click here for an Excel display of the USDA numbers). The September report forecasted an all cotton U.S. yield of 849 lb and production of 13.85 million bales -- an increase in yield and production over the previous month's forecast. U.S. exports were lowered from 15 million to 14.5 million statistical bales. The bottom line of the September report is a forecast of 4.9 million bales of 2008/09 ending stocks. This is a 300,000 bale increase over last month's forecast but still significantly smaller ending stocks compared to the previous year. This implies two opposing fundamental effects. In the near term we might expect a negative supply/demand effect as suggested by past upward revisions in monthly stocks-to-use forecasts. We have already seen a dramatic decline in cotton futures, beaten down by outside market forces reacting to the financial crisis. Assuming the banking system and stock/bond/commodity markets get out of crisis mode, and the real economy grinds back from recession or reduced growth levels, the longer term outlook for cotton would still suggest higher prices based on lower ending stocks -- certainly back into the 60s and low 70s. That would jibe with longer term forecasts of higher world prices, e.g., the International Cotton Advisory Committee's forecast of a 79 cent season average A-Index for 2008/09. (As before, this in turn implies a small LDP payment rate.)

 
Cotton 2008/09 Caveats

Demand Uncertainty. The two main elements of demand for U.S. cotton are domestic mill use (recently level after long-term down trend) and exports. The latter is generally more important as it represents 70% to 80% of total use of U.S. cotton. The week ending September 25 showed relatively weak export sales of 111,900 running bales of all cotton (i.e., upland and pima combined). Actual export shipments of 235,200 running bales were below the weekly level needed to meet USDA's project export level for 2008/09. If we don't see huge export sales in response to the recent low prices, I would expect USDA to further lower their projected export target. It remains to be seen how the current crisis in the financial markets will affect the general economy, which in turn would reduce consumption of cotton-based goods.

Supply Uncertainty. The September USDA report's increase (i.e., from the August report) in forecasted U.S. yield and production was based on field surveying in major cotton producing states from the last week of August through the first week of September. This is the same time frame in which Hanna and Gustav drenched the eastern U.S. cotton growing regions. It remains a question how much the field survey process incorporated potential yield losses from those storm events. Monthly revisions to USDA cotton forecasts are a common thing. Recent history shows about an average 8% adjustment in USDA's U.S. cotton August production projection over the succeeding months. Over the last ten years, this includes 5% to 10% downward revisions in dry years when "small crops got smaller", as well as 10% to 15% upward revisions when "big crops got bigger". We will see what, if any, supply revisions are made by USDA in their October 10 report.

 
Cotton Technical Analysis and Nearby Futures Prices

Technical analysis involves predicting price movements based on earlier price patterns, calculated support/resistance levels, moving averages, retracements, and other indicators. Technical analysis may have implications for hedgers even though their market entry/exit isn't as frequent as professional traders.

Near Term Price Trends. Cotton futures continued to decline during the week ending October 3. As of this writing (Monday morning) Dec08 was trading below 55 cents, with the U.S. dollar trading higher and the stock market falling. Other agricultural futures fell last week as well, being driven lower by continued liquidation in the fund sector.

Spechedge Numbers. Since June of 2007 the net position of speculative traders that swing either long or short (i.e., hedge funds and small speculators) has been net long. Over these twelve months there have been three major price rallies, mostly attributed to this speculative buying on top of index fund buying (which isn't reflected in the spechedge chart). However, from February's peak of 7,245,800 bales worth of net long futures positions, the net speculative long position (reflecting the "Customers Only" category) dropped to net short in August, and then has maintained a modest net long position for almost two months. At the same time, net long position of index funds has shrunk considerably, so overall there is a major drop in buying from the fund sector.

Certificated Stocks. Certificated (i.e., deliverable) stocks declined to 1.36 million bales as of October 3. This includes 127,034 bales in Galveston which remains suspended from normal futures delivery activities due to physical complications from Hurricane Ike. (Houston was returned to normal status last week). This means literally that no cotton can be delivered or taken delivery of at the Galveston location, and that no delivery notices can be issued either.

To review, certificated stocks represent merchant inventory that is in position to be delivered against short futures contract positions. A high level of certificated stocks enhances the possibility of delivery (which ordinarily would reinforce the economic linkage between futures and cash markets, i.e., by driving futures prices down towards cash prices).

Cotton Marketing Strategies

A marketing plan is a price contingency plan of actions that a grower/hedger will take in various possible, but ultimately uncertain, future market situations. The only thing that is certain is what you can pay right now to reduce your risk. It is basically an insurance question. A marketing plan can include many elements, probably in combination with each other. These could include basic tactics like forward contracting, selling at harvest, marketing pools, and the USDA loan program. Hedging with futures and options can complement or substitute for these basic tactics.

Cotton Historical Examples Emphasizing The Flexibility of Options Strategies

Recent history provides five examples of how different price patterns can be approached with the flexibility offered by options strategies. The first is December 2003 whose unexpected late-season price surge highlights the need for upside price flexibility in your marketing strategy. The second example highlights the need for a price floor when you have a reasonable expectation of a major price decline, as in early December 2004. The third and fourth examples are from December 2005 and December 2006 when prices traded in a narrow band below most growers' costs of production. In this situation, insuring a meaningful price floor using put options would have been more expensive, so various spread strategies could have been employed to finance the core put option strategy. The last example is December 2007 when more volatile and higher prices provided more opportunities to set a flexible floor using options.

Cotton Educational Resources
The Texas AgriLife Extension Service offers a number of resources on marketing and risk management. The pre-plant educational meetings offered by county extension agents often include market outlook information. Extension agricultural economists regularly conduct half-day or one-day trainings introducing the topic of hedging with futures and options -- to have one in your area, contact your county agent. In addition, Extension Economists periodically offer Master Marketer workshops, which involve 64 hours of training aimed at developing a comprehensive marketing plan. The next Master Marketer workshop will start in February 2009 in the San Angelo area. Additional one or two-day Advanced Topic Series workshops are offered annually to supplement Master Marketer. Extension economists and county agents are involved in a number of marketing clubs which provide growers an opportunity for more regular interaction and discussion about marketing. We facilitate the monthly Ag Market Network activity which connects growers and marketing clubs with panels of knowledgeable analysts. To support all these efforts, we also have an extensive on-line library of short articles about various topics related to marketing and risk management. A good, comprehensive and cotton-focused on-line bulletin about the cotton futures market is available courtesy of my colleague Blake Bennett and Cotton Incorporated. A paper about Texas cotton transportation and logistics compares current cotton flow data with information from the 1980s and 1990s. Lastly, with permission from the good folks at Cotton Outlook, I am reprinting here a descriptive, background article entitled Trends and Prospects for Texas Cotton.
 
The Cotton Marketing Planner
http://agecon2.tamu.edu/people/faculty/robinson-john/

Dr. John R. C. Robinson
Associate Professor
Extension Economist-Cotton Marketing
Department of Agricultural Economics
Texas A&M University
2124 TAMU
College Station, TX 77843-2124
Phone: (979) 845-8011
Fax: (979) 845-4906
Email: jrcr@tamu.edu

Maintained by: Dr. John R. C. Robinson (Contact Webmaster)
Designed by: Shelley M. Underbrink (smunderbrink@ag.tamu.edu)

Cotton Incorporated
This project supported by Cotton Incorporated

State of Texas Links
State of Texas
Statewide Search
Compact with Texans
University Policies
Privacy Policy
Open Records Policy
Accessibility Policy

University Links
Texas A&M University
Texas Cooperative Extension
Department of Agricultural Economics
Extension Agricultural Economics